A bit more religious freedom

By Smile Rose

 Apostasy need not necessarily be punished by death

 كتبت صحسفة Economist البريطانية مقالة عن حرية العقيدة فى مصر وتحدثت عن حكم المحكمة فى يناير الماضى وذكرت ان البهائيين هم جامعة قوية اثرت ان تلتزم الصدق فى تدوين البيانات صحيحة فى الاوراق الرسمية.

economist.png

TWENTY-SEVEN years ago, Egypt revised its secular constitution to enshrine Muslim sharia as “the principal source of legislation”. To most citizens, most of the time, that seeming contradiction—between secularism and religion—has not made much difference. Nine in ten Egyptians are Sunni Muslims and expect Islam to govern such things as marriage, divorce and inheritance. Nearly all the rest profess Christianity or Judaism, faiths recognised and protected in Islam. But to the small minority who embrace other faiths, or who have tried to leave Islam, it has, until lately, made an increasingly troubling difference.

Members of Egypt’s 2,000-strong Bahai community, for instance, have found they cannot state their religion on the national identity cards that all Egyptians are obliged to produce to secure such things as driver’s licences, bank accounts, social insurance and state schooling. Hundreds of Coptic Christians who have converted to Islam, often to escape the Orthodox sect’s ban on divorce, find they cannot revert to their original faith. In some cases, children raised as Christians have discovered that, because a divorced parent converted to Islam, they too have become officially Muslim, and cannot claim otherwise.

But such views have lately been challenged. Last year Ali Gomaa, the Grand Mufti, who is the government’s highest religious adviser, declared that nowhere in Islam’s sacred texts did it say that apostasy need be punished in the present rather than by God in the afterlife. In the past month, Egyptian courts have issued two rulings that, while restricted in scope, should ease some bothersome strictures. Bahais may now leave the space for religion on their identity cards blank. Twelve former Christians won a lawsuit and may now return to their original faith, on condition that their identity documents note their previous adherence to Islam.

Small steps, perhaps, but they point the way towards freedom of choice and citizenship based on equal rights rather than membership of a privileged religion.

 

رد واحد إلى “A bit more religious freedom”

  1. badooor يقول:

    هى الناس ديه عرفه كل حاجة كده
    واللهى العظيم عيب لما يبقو اللى برة بيدفعوا عن ناس مؤمنين بسيدنا محمد وانتم يلى مؤمنين به بتشتمونا وتهزقونا وتقولو اننا كفرة وجيين نهد الاسلام قال يعنى الاسلام دة بيت ورق واحنا حننفخ فيه نوقعه
    عيب الاسلام دين الهى ارسله الله وهو قادر على حمايته منى ومن غيرى لكننا نجعل المسيحى الذى يؤمن بالبهائية يؤمن بسيدنامحمد
    فهل نحن ظالمون

اترك رد